Things we said today *

It was a moment to savour. Something to remember. And after (in my case) nine years of Synod membership during which it has been the main pre-occupation of many, the King’s Great Matter is resolved. (Regular readers: I hereby promise I shall not use that line ever again.)

This blog has tended to report matters of synodical detail and politics – close votes, tea-room gossip, and so on. But today it all happened on the floor of Synod, and it was all over in five minutes. The Registrar, Stephen Slack, read out the royal proclamation, and we voted on a show of hands to go with it.

The vote being taken

That’s me, the balding head on the bottom right with the luminous screen and my hand in the air.

B2pssaRIEAA0DS1

The Registrar supervises the signing of the Canon

Bizarrely, as I looked round while voting, I saw most of the small group behind me – about a dozen of them) were not raising their arms. Then, when the ‘No’ votes were called, I saw they were all voting against. It felt very odd – as ifs I was sitting into he wrong place. Anyway, the vote was overwhelming, with maybe two dozen against.

The ‘Gang of Six’ then had to sign the document – that is, the two Archbishops, clergy Prolocutors and Chair and Vice Chair of the House of Laity. It was slightly comic to see them shuffling the paper along the bench and then passing the pen to each other.

Once it was done, we had a moment of silence. Archbishop Sentamu had warned against any cheering or applause – we were to be in ‘dignified silence’. Then he led in prayer (the General Thanksgiving and a collect). And then it was on to next business.

And now for something completely different

Everyone (me included) expected Archbishop Justin’s Presidential Address to cover some of the aftermath of the vote – women Bishop in the Lords, the process for first appointments, etc. However, he very wisely did something different: he took us on a world detour, recounting the impact of his marathon visit to all the Anglican provinces. There were pictures of some of the joyful and some of the horrific moments, special mentions for the bravery of some Anglican leaders, like those in South Sudan, and a witty dashing of expectations about the next Lambeth Conference. Those who go by precedent would expect him to call it in 2018. But he’s not going to. If it happens, it will be a collegial decision of the world primates, and it will be at a time they choose. (I heard that this was a swipe at Archbishop Katherine Jefferts Schori of the Episcopal Church of the USA, who has been reported as saying it’s not going to happen.)

It was an epic, passionate address and you can read it here. Or watch it via YouTube here.

In other news

There was a very sombre mood for the rest of the day. The opening Report of the Agenda brought forth some heavyweight stuff about the forthcoming human sexuality discussions. I attempted a rather more lightweight contribution about preparations for the election of a new Synod next year and the need to help educate Synod members in our strange ways – and the use of social media to inform, educate and entertain the folks back home on all things synodical. Something I hope this blog does for some of you.

We got through a mountain of legislative stuff – everything from the rules allowing sheep to safely graze in rural churchyard without needing a faculty (no, really) to reforming the voting rules affecting the Diocese of Europe. The major item of interest for me was the Guidelines for Professional Conduct of the Clergy (read them here).  As predicted, there was much concern about the risks of the confidentiality applicable to formal confession. As I noted in my earlier post (but I was not called the speak)  this is a tangle that needs sorting out. The Bishop of Durham helpfully clarified the church’s position on reporting abuse; one or two clergy wanted to maintain the ‘traditional’ seal of the confessional. The lawyers and the working party will have to untangle it all now.

Question Time brought forth a little trickle of uncertainty and (I suspect) resentment about the Green Report. No, nothing to do with carbon footprints, but a document not seen by Synod, but alluded to by some questioners who have got to hear about it somehow. It is (apparently) looking at ways in which the Church can develop and ‘bring on’ future leaders. Andreas Whittam Smith spoke of the £2m the Commissioners are putting into the project (I think I heard that right). A succession of largely hostile questions did little to illuminate things, other than a extracting a commitment from the Bishop of Ely that Synod might get to see the report in February.

So, not the most gripping day, but a highly significant and memorable one. It was good to be there.

 

* The Beatles Things we said today Plaintive, simple, Lennon-McCartney from A Hard Days’ Night 1964

Advertisements
This entry was posted in 2014: Nov - London, General Synod and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Things we said today *

  1. Pingback: Homeward bound * | bathwellschap

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s